(Alternate title of this post: “How to trade Dalembert and his cap-killing contract”)
All right, a couple of quick trade ideas:
IDEA #1:
T-Mac
for
Dalembert and Iggy
Word on the street is Houston wants McGrady gone. They have a great young scrappy/hustle team, which has earned itself an 18-13 record in the super-competitive West. And that’s without Yao Ming.
This trade gives Houston a much-needed center to protect the rim, and a go-to guy in Iggy (who does a little of everything, and can score in the clutch). The team improves enough with this trade to go deep in the playoffs. Plus, they would get another year after this with Sammy, which provides insurance for Yao — who’s about as durable as an egg (an expiring contract they could trade next year if Sammy turns out to be superfluous.)
IDEA #2:
Steve Blake, Travis Outlaw, Juwan Howard (all expiring)
for
Dalembert, Speights, and $5M cash
Portland has a seriously good team that could make a real run. But both of their centers are done for the season. Basically, we’d be giving them Dalembert and cash for the expiring contracts of expendable players. But...
They’ll be stuck with Sammy and his $12M pay check NEXT YEAR when Oden and Przybilla are back. That’s why we’d need to give up Speights. It makes the trade worth doing for them.
Yeah, all things being equal, I’d rather keep Iggy (despite his too-big contract). And I’d absolutely hate to give up Speights (young stud who we have on the super-cheap). But either of these trades would put us far enough under the cap that a small additional trade or two would put us in the LeBron/Wade sweepstakes. So you have to do it if you can.
You feeling me, Ed?
Monday, December 28, 2009
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Coolest. Man. Who. Ever. Lived.
1983 is starting to feel like a loooong time ago. Great to have A.I. back, but I can't even imagine a Sixers team that might someday threaten a "Fo, fo, fo" again in the playoffs/finals.
Anyway, this is from the All-Star Game that year -- the late, great Marvin. I'm not big on hyperbole, but...f**k it, I'm saying this: Marvin's National Anthem will never be topped.
Anyway, this is from the All-Star Game that year -- the late, great Marvin. I'm not big on hyperbole, but...f**k it, I'm saying this: Marvin's National Anthem will never be topped.
Labels:
1983,
marvin gaye,
national anthem,
nba all-star game
Monday, December 7, 2009
Outstanding
From ESPN.com:
CLEVELAND -- NBA commissioner David Stern said in an interview with Sports Illustrated he believes a woman could be playing in the league at some point in the next decade.
Cavaliers forward LeBron James isn't so sure. The reigning NBA MVP was asked about Stern's comments prior to the Bulls-Cavaliers game on Friday night.
"Ten years?" James asked. "That's, like, right around the corner. [In] 10 years, I'll be 34. I'll still be in the NBA. I think 10 years is pushing it, honestly."
Translation: "You think some ho gonna be able to beat ME?! Heeeeells no."
The diplomacy of LBJ is borderline-hilarious, since what he really wants to say is always right on his face. But when he gets questions like this...it's just downright hysterical.
He is, indeed, the King.
P.S. Holy sh!t, LeBron James is only 24-years-old. ?!?!?!?!
CLEVELAND -- NBA commissioner David Stern said in an interview with Sports Illustrated he believes a woman could be playing in the league at some point in the next decade.
Cavaliers forward LeBron James isn't so sure. The reigning NBA MVP was asked about Stern's comments prior to the Bulls-Cavaliers game on Friday night.
"Ten years?" James asked. "That's, like, right around the corner. [In] 10 years, I'll be 34. I'll still be in the NBA. I think 10 years is pushing it, honestly."
Translation: "You think some ho gonna be able to beat ME?! Heeeeells no."
The diplomacy of LBJ is borderline-hilarious, since what he really wants to say is always right on his face. But when he gets questions like this...it's just downright hysterical.
He is, indeed, the King.
P.S. Holy sh!t, LeBron James is only 24-years-old. ?!?!?!?!
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Loud mouths in glass houses...
No, no, Dana — the “prak-tiss” thing is tired as shit.
I’ll tell you what never gets old. This...
“F**k Notre Dame! F**k Touchdown Jesus! F**k Jesus!”
Labels:
allen iverson,
dana jacobson,
jesus,
notre dame,
sixers
Before we start blaming AI...
Iverson is likely to return to the court — in his old Sixers uni (!) — next Monday against the Nugz. Which means we have until about next Friday to start hearing how much Iverson is ruining this team.
So let me say this now (not that it’s any revelation):
This team is already in ruins.
Kevin Durant is awesome, yes. And Jeff Green, Russell Westbook, James Harden, etc., comprise a nice, talented young squad. But this Sixers team, as constructed, should not be dropping games to the Zombie Sonics by an eleven-point margin. That’s not just a loss; that’s an indication of some fundamental problem(s).
Let me name two: our defense blows, and we don’t rebound for shit.
No, Elton, please -- don’t leave your feet.
From last night’s box score...
Total rebounds --
PHL: 29
OKC: 43
You can’t win like that. And it’s not like they were trying to fend off huge guys in the paint. Christ, even I can box out Nick Collison — and I’m five-f**king-nine!
The Erz also gave them waaaay too many wide-open looks. The Zombies shot 50% from deep (12/24). And 16 Sixer turnovers (which isn’t horrible) turned into 23 points (which is), thanks to the aforementioned crap-ass defense. (You do NOT allow a team to convert on 72% of your TOs. You just don’t.)
(shaking my head)
Get back on D. Stay glued to your man. Learn how to switch on the rotations. Put a hand in the shooter’s face. Make good fouls when needed. Clean the glass.
These are basic basketball fundamentals. A 10-year-old in hoops summer camp learns this. So why does a professional squad making a combined $63M/year not get it?
No matter. It’ll all be AI’s fault soon enough. (Like, within a week.)
-G
So let me say this now (not that it’s any revelation):
This team is already in ruins.
Kevin Durant is awesome, yes. And Jeff Green, Russell Westbook, James Harden, etc., comprise a nice, talented young squad. But this Sixers team, as constructed, should not be dropping games to the Zombie Sonics by an eleven-point margin. That’s not just a loss; that’s an indication of some fundamental problem(s).
Let me name two: our defense blows, and we don’t rebound for shit.
No, Elton, please -- don’t leave your feet.
From last night’s box score...
Total rebounds --
PHL: 29
OKC: 43
You can’t win like that. And it’s not like they were trying to fend off huge guys in the paint. Christ, even I can box out Nick Collison — and I’m five-f**king-nine!
The Erz also gave them waaaay too many wide-open looks. The Zombies shot 50% from deep (12/24). And 16 Sixer turnovers (which isn’t horrible) turned into 23 points (which is), thanks to the aforementioned crap-ass defense. (You do NOT allow a team to convert on 72% of your TOs. You just don’t.)
(shaking my head)
Get back on D. Stay glued to your man. Learn how to switch on the rotations. Put a hand in the shooter’s face. Make good fouls when needed. Clean the glass.
These are basic basketball fundamentals. A 10-year-old in hoops summer camp learns this. So why does a professional squad making a combined $63M/year not get it?
No matter. It’ll all be AI’s fault soon enough. (Like, within a week.)
-G
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Easy answer for The Answer
From J.A. Adande’s piece, published in early November:
"He does have to show some sort of growth," the Eastern Conference exec said. "Even if it's just cosmetic. That's what he needs to show."
There'll never been another player like Iverson. Except now he has to follow a pattern that's been set before him. The older veteran yielding, acknowledging he can no longer dominate, helping out where he can.
For example …
"Gary Payton with the Heat," the Eastern Conference executive said. "You're going to tell me AI couldn't do that?"
Uh, what? You want Iverson -- Allen Iverson -- to do this?
Marc Stein expressed a similar sentiment yesterday on ESPN.com.
What I don’t get is, WHY DON’T THESE GUYS GET IT?
Growth? Acceptance? Seriously? Come on. We know who Iverson is. He’s been the same player* with the same mentality, more or less, since Georgetown. It comes down to two main things with him:
1. He wants to start
2. He wants his teams to play hard and try their damndest to win
That’s it. If you’re willing to accept that, AI will be good for your team. He will. Why is this so hard to understand?
Per Marc Stein:
Iverson missed almost all of training camp with a slightly torn hamstring, played 18 minutes in his Grizzlies debut after missing the first three regular-season games, then complained immediately and loudly about coming off the bench and playing a reduced role.
The Answer's unforgettable prac-tiss routine made more sense.**
No player on Earth goes from an injury that severe straight into heavy minutes … especially not after missing all of camp with his new team. You'll note that even the most desperate team on Earth -- New Jersey -- has been bringing Devin Harris off the bench since the Nets' lone All-Star returned this weekend from his groin troubles.
“Heavy minutes” and “starting” are not one in the same. You can start Iverson and play him only 10-15 a night until he gets his legs back. He will accept this. He will. What he won’t accept is coming off the bench. Yes, that’s unconventional. Yes, Devin Harris is willing to do that. But AI isn’t. So?
Is this a little ridiculous? Maybe. But this is who the man is.
I’m not defending it, nor am I judging it.*** I’m just saying that it is what it is. It’s what’s on the table, and it’s what’s been on the table, for almost 15 years. So how are so many coaches, GMs, sports writers, etc., not seeing it?
You know how I feel about seeing Iverson in a Sixers uni again. I know it won’t mean much in terms of wins and losses, and I know we’ll be starting over again next year -- pretty much from scratch -- without him. F it. The thought of The Answer playing for us again gives me a warm feeling I haven’t had about Sixers basketball in a long, long time.
Let’s hope Snider and Jordan don’t eff it up. Just let him start, gentlemen. Just let him start.
-G
* All right, not quite the same. That explosive first step is gone, for one thing.
** I hate that this story won’t die. Especially since no one remembers the whole story. Let’s consider the context of the infamous “prac-tiss” interview: Spring 2002, first round of the playoffs against the C’s. After dropping the first two games, AI put the team on his back and scored a combined 71 points over the next two games to even it up. He said after Game Four: “Win. It’s the only thing we can think about. We fought hard to get back in the series...the only thing I care about is finishing out.” But come Game Five, AI was the only Sixer who showed up; the rest of the team was sleepwalking. They got bounced. HARD. In the post-game press conference, a frustrated Larry Brown inexplicably saw fit to talk about Allen’s absence from practices during the season. (Now, was Iverson guilty of this? Undoubtedly. But there’s a time and a place for criticism. And this was not it, LB.) So when it was Iverson’s turn at the mic, they went after him. Iverson answered (upset): “Franchise players don’t go through this. Franchise players’ daughters don’t have to go to school and hear, ‘Is your daddy coming back? What’s going on with your daddy and Coach Brown?’ And yadda yadda. She’s 7 years old and that’s what she has to deal with. It hurts because...I do all I can for this city, this team, this franchise and my teammates. I don’t think nobody in the world plays harder than me. I’m tired, you know. Everybody in Philadelphia knows that I want to be a Sixer for the rest of my career. But I’m tired and hurt, too.” Then a reporter fired back with this: “Allen, could you be clear about your practicing habits since we can’t see you practice?” THAT’S when Iverson went off. And you know what? I would’ve gone off, too.
*** Okay, I’m defending it a little. AI has always been a team leader, and being a starter is important to him. It’s a psychological thing. As his coach, I’d be more than proud and happy to start Allen. You can’t run a successful team if the players aren’t 100% dedicated to the cause. Why piss off one of your key guys over something so small and insignificant? Seriously? Why, why, why? Can you tell I want to pull my own hair out?!
"He does have to show some sort of growth," the Eastern Conference exec said. "Even if it's just cosmetic. That's what he needs to show."
There'll never been another player like Iverson. Except now he has to follow a pattern that's been set before him. The older veteran yielding, acknowledging he can no longer dominate, helping out where he can.
For example …
"Gary Payton with the Heat," the Eastern Conference executive said. "You're going to tell me AI couldn't do that?"
Uh, what? You want Iverson -- Allen Iverson -- to do this?
Marc Stein expressed a similar sentiment yesterday on ESPN.com.
What I don’t get is, WHY DON’T THESE GUYS GET IT?
Growth? Acceptance? Seriously? Come on. We know who Iverson is. He’s been the same player* with the same mentality, more or less, since Georgetown. It comes down to two main things with him:
1. He wants to start
2. He wants his teams to play hard and try their damndest to win
That’s it. If you’re willing to accept that, AI will be good for your team. He will. Why is this so hard to understand?
Per Marc Stein:
Iverson missed almost all of training camp with a slightly torn hamstring, played 18 minutes in his Grizzlies debut after missing the first three regular-season games, then complained immediately and loudly about coming off the bench and playing a reduced role.
The Answer's unforgettable prac-tiss routine made more sense.**
No player on Earth goes from an injury that severe straight into heavy minutes … especially not after missing all of camp with his new team. You'll note that even the most desperate team on Earth -- New Jersey -- has been bringing Devin Harris off the bench since the Nets' lone All-Star returned this weekend from his groin troubles.
“Heavy minutes” and “starting” are not one in the same. You can start Iverson and play him only 10-15 a night until he gets his legs back. He will accept this. He will. What he won’t accept is coming off the bench. Yes, that’s unconventional. Yes, Devin Harris is willing to do that. But AI isn’t. So?
Is this a little ridiculous? Maybe. But this is who the man is.
I’m not defending it, nor am I judging it.*** I’m just saying that it is what it is. It’s what’s on the table, and it’s what’s been on the table, for almost 15 years. So how are so many coaches, GMs, sports writers, etc., not seeing it?
You know how I feel about seeing Iverson in a Sixers uni again. I know it won’t mean much in terms of wins and losses, and I know we’ll be starting over again next year -- pretty much from scratch -- without him. F it. The thought of The Answer playing for us again gives me a warm feeling I haven’t had about Sixers basketball in a long, long time.
Let’s hope Snider and Jordan don’t eff it up. Just let him start, gentlemen. Just let him start.
-G
* All right, not quite the same. That explosive first step is gone, for one thing.
** I hate that this story won’t die. Especially since no one remembers the whole story. Let’s consider the context of the infamous “prac-tiss” interview: Spring 2002, first round of the playoffs against the C’s. After dropping the first two games, AI put the team on his back and scored a combined 71 points over the next two games to even it up. He said after Game Four: “Win. It’s the only thing we can think about. We fought hard to get back in the series...the only thing I care about is finishing out.” But come Game Five, AI was the only Sixer who showed up; the rest of the team was sleepwalking. They got bounced. HARD. In the post-game press conference, a frustrated Larry Brown inexplicably saw fit to talk about Allen’s absence from practices during the season. (Now, was Iverson guilty of this? Undoubtedly. But there’s a time and a place for criticism. And this was not it, LB.) So when it was Iverson’s turn at the mic, they went after him. Iverson answered (upset): “Franchise players don’t go through this. Franchise players’ daughters don’t have to go to school and hear, ‘Is your daddy coming back? What’s going on with your daddy and Coach Brown?’ And yadda yadda. She’s 7 years old and that’s what she has to deal with. It hurts because...I do all I can for this city, this team, this franchise and my teammates. I don’t think nobody in the world plays harder than me. I’m tired, you know. Everybody in Philadelphia knows that I want to be a Sixer for the rest of my career. But I’m tired and hurt, too.” Then a reporter fired back with this: “Allen, could you be clear about your practicing habits since we can’t see you practice?” THAT’S when Iverson went off. And you know what? I would’ve gone off, too.
*** Okay, I’m defending it a little. AI has always been a team leader, and being a starter is important to him. It’s a psychological thing. As his coach, I’d be more than proud and happy to start Allen. You can’t run a successful team if the players aren’t 100% dedicated to the cause. Why piss off one of your key guys over something so small and insignificant? Seriously? Why, why, why? Can you tell I want to pull my own hair out?!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)